🔗 Share this article

The federal appeals court has upheld a prohibition on deploying state troops in Portland, Oregon, after a latest legal decision.

Appeals Court Agrees to Rehear Case

The federal appeals court decided on this week that it would rehear the case concerning the president’s authority with an larger panel of 11 judges. The court also vacated a earlier decision from a three-judge panel that had supported the administration.

Ongoing Dispute Over Military Presence

This order represents the latest development in a long-running court case over whether the administration has the authority and justification to send state military units in the city. Approximately two hundred troops have been in uncertainty since late September when the deployment effort was started in response to ongoing demonstrations.

Differing Viewpoints

The federal government has claimed that government employees at the ICE facility in south Portland were facing threats, while local authorities maintain that local officers have command of the circumstances.

Contrary to characterizations of the city as a conflict zone, locals have been posting videos of scenic paths and a vibrant culinary culture, and planning events such as an Emergency Naked Bike Ride against the increased military presence.

Court Proceedings

The appeals court decision came after a federal judge in the city issued two temporary restraining orders this month – one blocking the federal control of the Oregon national guard, and another prohibiting the deployment of any military personnel in Oregon, after efforts to evade the first order by calling up troops from California.

On Monday, the ninth circuit panel had put the first ruling on hold – allowing command of state troops – but the subsequent injunction remained in place, blocking the actual deployment of the troops.

Full Panel Consideration

The latest ruling means the issue will be heard “en banc” – with all decisions under review together – by a group of 11 judges.

“This decision shows that facts are important and that the courts are striving to hold this administration accountable. The founding document limits the president’s power, and Oregon’s communities cannot be treated as a training ground for unchecked federal authority,” stated the state attorney general in a official comment.

“The judicial body is sending a definite signal: the president cannot send the military into US cities without cause. We will continue protecting Oregon’s laws, values, and sovereignty as this case progresses and our fight continues in the courts.”